3 years ago

Category: Software

by When we develop software we do it in a team: that is, we are a group of people, including engineers and developers, who contribute to the development of the different parts of the software.

In non-continuous development, the developments of the different parts of the software proceed independently for a long time, and it is only at the moment of integration that any (inevitable) problems emerge: the moment of integration, therefore, became the litmus test of design errors and/or development, which was often cumbersome to remedy given the period since the beginning of development.

Lots of advantages for a quality code: Continuous delivery is the intrinsic consequence of continuous integration: if the software is continuously and frequently integrated, then it is also continuously and frequently releasable in production, that is, publishable online and visible to the customer.

In what terms does development with continuous integration bring quality to software development and ultimately to the eyes of the end customer, even non-technical ones?